Statistic |
Number |
U.S. Rank (Percentile) |
State Rank (Percentile) |
|---|---|---|---|
63,328 |
463 (of 25,150) (98%) |
37 (of 1510) (98%) |
|
$81,767 |
784 (97%) |
57 (96%) |
|
$158,000 |
3,249 (87%) |
82 (95%) |
Statistic |
Percent |
U.S. Rank (Percentile) |
State Rank (Percentile) |
|---|---|---|---|
66.0% |
21,562 (of 25,150) (14%) |
1,284 (of 1510) (15%) |
|
5.2% |
5,591 (78%) |
475 (69%) |
|
8.0% |
4,362 (83%) |
1,052 (30%) |
|
23.8% |
146 (99%) |
2 (100%) |
|
0.2% |
16,012 (36%) |
1,188 (21%) |
Statistic |
Percent |
U.S. Rank (Percentile) |
State Rank (Percentile) |
|---|---|---|---|
21,159 |
623 (of 25,150) (98%) |
44 (of 1510) (97%) |
|
1.0% |
22,967 (9%) |
1,206 (20%) |
|
25.9% |
819 (97%) |
44 (97%) |
|
7.1 |
992 (96%) |
55 (96%) |
|
1.3% |
22,468 (11%) |
1,315 (13%) |
|
24.2% |
5,952 (76%) |
228 (85%) |
|
0.2% |
3,140 (88%) |
168 (89%) |
|
$158,000 |
3,249 (87%) |
82 (95%) |
|
0.7% |
14,895 (41%) |
881 (42%) |
|
9.7% |
1,159 (95%) |
55 (96%) |
|
$939 |
1,238 (95%) |
54 (96%) |
Statistic |
Number |
U.S. Rank (Percentile) |
State Rank (Percentile) |
|---|---|---|---|
69.5% |
5,131 (of 25,150) (80%) |
225 (of 1510) (85%) |
|
84.3% |
5,414 (78%) |
298 (80%) |
|
1.4% |
5,186 (79%) |
98 (94%) |
|
0.2% |
21,174 (16%) |
1,200 (21%) |
|
29.6 |
5,288 (79%) |
393 (74%) |
|
2.8% |
22,473 (11%) |
1,366 (10%) |
|
8.5% |
961 (96%) |
66 (96%) |
|
$81,767 |
784 (97%) |
57 (96%) |
|
0.9% |
19,636 (22%) |
1,239 (18%) |
|
$33,506 |
1,391 (94%) |
86 (94%) |
|
$63,834 |
823 (97%) |
54 (96%) |
|
$37,498 |
1,454 (94%) |
78 (95%) |
|
3.2% |
19,703 (22%) |
1,296 (14%) |
|
3.8% |
21,667 (14%) |
1,363 (10%) |
Closest cities |
City |
Distance |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|
250,000 People |
17 Miles | |||
50,000 People |
N/A |
N/A | ||
10,000 People |
N/A |
N/A | ||
1,000 People |
N/A |
N/A | ||
Rural Score (New York = 1.00, Atka, Alaska = 0.00) |
0.92 |
|||
Category |
Similarity Score |
|---|---|
0.87 |
|
0.87 |
|
0.87 |
|
0.86 |
|
0.86 |
|
0.86 |
|
0.86 |
|
0.85 |
|
0.85 |
|
0.85 |
Category |
Number |
Rank (of 25,150) |
|---|---|---|
4,326 |
31 |
|
6,415 |
42 |
|
10.1% |
46 |
|
6.8% |
49 |
|
1,373 |
50 |
Category |
Number |
Rank (of 1510) |
|---|---|---|
10.1% |
1 |
|
15.0% |
1 |
|
23.8% |
2 |
|
25.1% |
2 |
|
6.8% |
3 |
Category |
Number |
Rank (of 25,150) |
|---|---|---|
0 |
24,654 |
|
0.0% |
24,646 |
|
0.0% |
24,474 |
|
13.3% |
24,190 |
|
76.5% |
24,133 |
Category |
Number |
Rank (of 1510) |
|---|---|---|
2.7% |
1,453 |
|
10.0% |
1,437 |
|
46.9% |
1,435 |
|
16.3% |
1,433 |
|
3.5% |
1,423 |
Statistic |
Sugar Land TX |
|
|---|---|---|
59,984 |
63,328 |
|
32.0 |
37.4 |
|
$60,661 |
$81,767 |
|
$151,400 |
$158,000 |
|
59.1% |
66.0% |
|
8.5% |
5.2% |
|
17.6% |
23.8% |
|
14.0% |
8.0% |

Social Data