Statistic |
Number |
U.S. Rank (Percentile) |
State Rank (Percentile) |
|---|---|---|---|
66,787 |
434 (of 25,150) (98%) |
100 (of 1081) (91%) |
|
$78,374 |
942 (96%) |
104 (90%) |
|
$242,600 |
1,302 (95%) |
314 (71%) |
Statistic |
Percent |
U.S. Rank (Percentile) |
State Rank (Percentile) |
|---|---|---|---|
56.4% |
22,511 (of 25,150) (10%) |
799 (of 1081) (26%) |
|
5.5% |
5,424 (78%) |
155 (86%) |
|
25.7% |
1,642 (93%) |
400 (63%) |
|
22.1% |
159 (99%) |
56 (95%) |
|
0.6% |
7,176 (71%) |
776 (28%) |
Statistic |
Percent |
U.S. Rank (Percentile) |
State Rank (Percentile) |
|---|---|---|---|
20,389 |
652 (of 25,150) (97%) |
123 (of 1081) (89%) |
|
0.8% |
23,084 (8%) |
919 (15%) |
|
11.6% |
4,335 (83%) |
84 (92%) |
|
6.4 |
2,258 (91%) |
66 (94%) |
|
1.8% |
21,731 (14%) |
931 (14%) |
|
30.5% |
2,604 (90%) |
145 (87%) |
|
0.5% |
2,088 (92%) |
277 (74%) |
|
$242,600 |
1,302 (95%) |
314 (71%) |
|
0.5% |
14,994 (40%) |
611 (43%) |
|
11.1% |
1,023 (96%) |
192 (82%) |
|
$1,035 |
822 (97%) |
167 (85%) |
Statistic |
Number |
U.S. Rank (Percentile) |
State Rank (Percentile) |
|---|---|---|---|
71.5% |
3,601 (of 25,150) (86%) |
95 (of 1081) (91%) |
|
80.1% |
10,581 (58%) |
202 (81%) |
|
2.0% |
3,880 (85%) |
350 (68%) |
|
0.3% |
20,822 (17%) |
944 (13%) |
|
39.8 |
752 (97%) |
48 (96%) |
|
2.7% |
22,494 (11%) |
949 (12%) |
|
3.7% |
2,302 (91%) |
248 (77%) |
|
$78,374 |
942 (96%) |
104 (90%) |
|
1.0% |
18,948 (25%) |
887 (18%) |
|
$26,182 |
3,023 (88%) |
294 (73%) |
|
$55,272 |
1,381 (95%) |
163 (85%) |
|
$38,620 |
1,263 (95%) |
195 (82%) |
|
3.7% |
18,680 (26%) |
819 (24%) |
|
5.1% |
19,843 (21%) |
886 (18%) |
Closest cities |
City |
Distance |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|
250,000 People |
12 Miles | |||
50,000 People |
N/A |
N/A | ||
10,000 People |
N/A |
N/A | ||
1,000 People |
N/A |
N/A | ||
Rural Score (New York = 1.00, Atka, Alaska = 0.00) |
0.93 |
|||
Category |
Similarity Score |
|---|---|
0.89 |
|
0.88 |
|
0.86 |
|
0.86 |
|
0.85 |
|
0.85 |
|
0.85 |
|
0.85 |
|
0.84 |
|
0.84 |
Category |
Number |
Rank (of 25,150) |
|---|---|---|
5,121 |
45 |
|
5,443 |
63 |
|
4,032 |
67 |
|
5,076 |
76 |
|
6,779 |
77 |
Category |
Number |
Rank (of 1081) |
|---|---|---|
3,455 |
20 |
|
95.4% |
21 |
|
20.4% |
22 |
|
32.4% |
22 |
|
23.1% |
27 |
Category |
Number |
Rank (of 25,150) |
|---|---|---|
4.6% |
24,774 |
|
14.7% |
24,667 |
|
1.6% |
24,549 |
|
9.5% |
24,515 |
|
5.4% |
24,514 |
Category |
Number |
Rank (of 1081) |
|---|---|---|
1.6% |
1,049 |
|
4.6% |
1,048 |
|
1.8% |
1,044 |
|
10.8% |
1,042 |
|
4.2% |
1,039 |
Statistic |
Chino Hills CA |
|
|---|---|---|
66,787 |
67,504 |
|
32.3 |
31.8 |
|
$78,374 |
$55,985 |
|
$242,600 |
$273,300 |
|
56.4% |
58.7% |
|
5.5% |
2.9% |
|
22.1% |
14.9% |
|
25.7% |
34.2% |

Social Data