Statistic |
Number |
U.S. Rank (Percentile) |
State Rank (Percentile) |
|---|---|---|---|
60,220 |
495 (of 25,150) (98%) |
10 (of 867) (99%) |
|
$57,965 |
2,692 (89%) |
81 (91%) |
|
$155,900 |
3,370 (87%) |
58 (93%) |
Statistic |
Percent |
U.S. Rank (Percentile) |
State Rank (Percentile) |
|---|---|---|---|
87.5% |
16,866 (of 25,150) (33%) |
808 (of 867) (7%) |
|
4.1% |
6,149 (76%) |
19 (98%) |
|
2.9% |
8,757 (65%) |
154 (82%) |
|
4.1% |
1,508 (94%) |
31 (96%) |
|
0.5% |
8,670 (66%) |
289 (67%) |
Statistic |
Percent |
U.S. Rank (Percentile) |
State Rank (Percentile) |
|---|---|---|---|
24,259 |
518 (of 25,150) (98%) |
9 (of 867) (99%) |
|
0.4% |
23,671 (6%) |
862 (1%) |
|
19.4% |
1,495 (94%) |
81 (91%) |
|
5.9 |
5,687 (77%) |
272 (69%) |
|
4.4% |
16,860 (33%) |
565 (35%) |
|
16.7% |
13,935 (45%) |
467 (46%) |
|
0.0% |
12,669 (50%) |
183 (79%) |
|
$155,900 |
3,370 (87%) |
58 (93%) |
|
1.5% |
14,035 (44%) |
546 (37%) |
|
4.1% |
2,133 (92%) |
31 (96%) |
|
$779 |
2,571 (90%) |
26 (97%) |
Statistic |
Number |
U.S. Rank (Percentile) |
State Rank (Percentile) |
|---|---|---|---|
79.8% |
620 (of 25,150) (98%) |
69 (of 867) (92%) |
|
81.6% |
8,651 (66%) |
234 (73%) |
|
2.9% |
2,921 (88%) |
72 (92%) |
|
1.0% |
18,202 (28%) |
709 (18%) |
|
22.4 |
14,712 (42%) |
364 (58%) |
|
3.8% |
21,121 (16%) |
707 (18%) |
|
2.0% |
4,482 (82%) |
126 (85%) |
|
$57,965 |
2,692 (89%) |
81 (91%) |
|
2.3% |
13,686 (46%) |
536 (38%) |
|
$27,093 |
2,682 (89%) |
69 (92%) |
|
$45,312 |
3,139 (88%) |
72 (92%) |
|
$31,848 |
3,067 (88%) |
79 (91%) |
|
3.7% |
18,754 (25%) |
534 (38%) |
|
5.1% |
19,897 (21%) |
628 (28%) |
Closest cities |
City |
Distance |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|
250,000 People |
14 Miles | |||
50,000 People |
N/A |
N/A | ||
10,000 People |
N/A |
N/A | ||
1,000 People |
N/A |
N/A | ||
Rural Score (New York = 1.00, Atka, Alaska = 0.00) |
0.92 |
|||
Category |
Similarity Score |
|---|---|
0.93 |
|
0.92 |
|
0.92 |
|
0.91 |
|
0.91 |
|
0.91 |
|
0.90 |
|
0.90 |
|
0.90 |
|
0.90 |
Category |
Number |
Rank (of 25,150) |
|---|---|---|
10,603 |
25 |
|
6,026 |
36 |
|
386 |
73 |
|
1,145 |
134 |
|
4,696 |
135 |
Category |
Number |
Rank (of 867) |
|---|---|---|
22 |
3 |
|
147 |
4 |
|
110 |
4 |
|
91 |
4 |
|
6,402 |
4 |
Category |
Number |
Rank (of 25,150) |
|---|---|---|
20.2% |
24,494 |
|
12.6% |
24,119 |
|
12.8% |
23,917 |
|
0.4% |
23,671 |
|
2.4% |
23,575 |
Category |
Number |
Rank (of 867) |
|---|---|---|
0.4% |
862 |
|
45.7% |
851 |
|
2.7% |
842 |
|
91.8% |
825 |
|
92.6% |
824 |
Statistic |
Burnsville MN |
|
|---|---|---|
60,220 |
63,557 |
|
33.0 |
32.8 |
|
$57,965 |
$67,388 |
|
$155,900 |
$164,500 |
|
87.5% |
88.0% |
|
4.1% |
3.4% |
|
4.1% |
5.3% |
|
2.9% |
2.2% |

Social Data